Part 2: An Unimplemented Cloud Governance Model is a SCAM!

Part 2: An Unimplemented Cloud Governance Model is a SCAM!

Anton Floor
Anton Floor

3 Sep 2024

2 min read

Define and Implement!

A well-defined and correctly implemented cloud governance model can be identified when a third-party “hero coder” working for your client angrily reports that they can’t get their work done. “I keep getting some damn error whenever I try to spin up these resources. Can you fix this, and fast? My work is at a standstill!” In this case, an AWS service control policy has prevented resources from being accidentally deployed in the us-east-1 region. The cloud governance model specifies that the approved locations are regions within the EU, and nothing can be deployed outside of these regions under any circumstances. At its best, collaboration with all parties is smooth and seamless, and the governance model doesn’t unnecessarily slow down development work. However, accidents like the one mentioned above do happen quite frequently, and it’s in everyone’s best interest that they’re prevented. To this end, it’s a good idea to create a short version of the governance model for partners, highlighting any potential restrictions. This way, no one gets frustrated, and projects start off with the right expectations.

Does It Have to Be Difficult?

When defining a cloud governance model, I’ve noticed that over 85% of the topics are the same for all organizations. Yet, in the consulting world, it’s always presented as “just for you.” In my opinion, the focus in defining a governance model should be on the meaningful 15% that is unique to the specific target organization, while the remaining 85% comes as a given. This doesn’t mean that the 85% is useless or worthless to the client, but rather, we prefer to offer it as a service. We believe our role is to educate client organizations on the fundamentals of cloud governance and help them define their unique aspects. We provide that 85% as predefined best practices, where we collectively gather the correct values. This means the cloud governance model should be parameterized so that the end result of the definition process is the configuration required for automation. This configuration builds the technical solution in the cloud, known as the “Landing Zone,” which implements all the services that monitor and protect the environments built there. In this way, policies ensure that everything is done “by the book.” Of course, this is built using an automated platform without the need for a massive implementation project and months of consulting engagements. In short, we offer a technical solution as a service: “Governance made easy.” The original post was written on 22 October 2020; this is the updated version.

Anton Floor

Anton Floor

Field Notes

Related Articles

Continue exploring cloud technology and best practices

Part 2: An Unimplemented Cloud Governance Model is a SCAM!

Resilience

8 min read

Cloud Risk Is Business Risk: What Your Board Needs to Know

Most boards treat cloud as a technology topic delegated to IT. That gap between perception and reality is where real business risk hides.

Read more
Part 2: An Unimplemented Cloud Governance Model is a SCAM!

Resilience

8 min read

Business Continuity When Geopolitics Is the Threat Model

Geopolitical conflict has become a direct threat to your cloud infrastructure. Your threat model just changed.

Read more
Part 2: An Unimplemented Cloud Governance Model is a SCAM!

AI

6 min read

Is Your AI High-Risk? A 5-minute Assessment for Business Leaders

Four questions to determine if your AI system faces mandatory EU AI Act compliance by August 2026. Covers the eight high-risk categories, obligations, and practical next steps.

Read more

Services

Related Services

Explore Cloud2 services related to this topic

Ready to discuss your cloud strategy?

Let's talk about how Cloud2 can help your organization.

Field Notes

Stay ahead of the cloud

Practical insights on AWS, Azure, security and AI. Delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.